56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
3
2
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
34
40
23

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich