56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Anzahl der Tests
14
13
9
Optimale Position
#8
#6
#5
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
10.9
10.8
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2023
Verfügbare Größen
153
61
73

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich