56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
16
10
3
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
5.5
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
153
104
40

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich