56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Preisvergleich | Vergleicher | Kontakt

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich Advantage

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Roadhawk

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

BFGoodrich

Advantage

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone

Roadhawk

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

21

10

Optimale Position

#8

#2

#2

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

13.4

3.3

11.9

6.0

Neuester Test

2026

2026

2024

2026

Verfügbare Größen

153

40

164

104

Nass

Nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Nassbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - längs

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Handling - nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - quer

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Kreisbahn nass

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Nassleistung

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

Seitenführung

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Trocken

Trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Trockenbremsen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Handling - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Trockenleistung

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Komfort

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Außengeräusch

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Komfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Innengeräusche

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Kosten

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rollwiderstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Kilometerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Preis-Wert

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen