56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
3
3
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
6.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
104
40
34

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich