56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
3
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.6
6.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
188
104
40
34

Nass

Nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Seitenführung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schneetraktion
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Schnee Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schnee Slalom
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trockenleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich