57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex

Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
36
3
21
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.1
3.3
11.9
3.7
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
296
40
164
34

Nass

Nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassleistung
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trockenleistung
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Preis-Wert
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich