Vergleich: Falken EuroWinter HS02 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

EuroWinter HS02

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

2

3

14

Optimale Position

#7

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.3

3.3

1.5

3.7

3.6

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

98

40

65

34

188

Nass

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Nassbremsen

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Handling - nass

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Seitenführung

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Schnee

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Schneetraktion

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Schnee Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Trocken

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Trockenbremsen

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Handling - trocken

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Komfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Komfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Kosten

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kilometerstand

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Falken EuroWinter HS02 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

EuroWinter HS02

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen