57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Fulda EcoControl HP gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
1
3
3
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.8
1.0
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
70
64
34
40

Nass

Nass
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Trocken

Trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich