56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
14
10
3
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.6
6.0
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
188
104
34
40

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich