56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
3
36
10
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.1
6.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
296
104
111

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich