56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken EuroWinter HS02 ProObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

5.5
R16 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Anzahl der Tests
3
13
14
3
Optimale Position
#2
#7
#1
#4
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
3.6
4.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
78
188
97

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich