56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
3
21
14
10
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
13.4
6.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
164
153
104

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich