57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
16
24
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
5.5
2.7
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
151
34
64

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich