Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WetProof

Turanza 6

7.7

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Turanza 6

Anzahl der Tests

3

14

13

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

5.6

6.2

Neuester Test

2026

2023

2026

Verfügbare Größen

40

47

225

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Nassleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

84%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

51%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Turanza 6

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen