Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

—

3

2

3

Optimale Position

—

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

—

3.3

1.0

3.7

Neuester Test

—

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

123

40

23

34

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen