Vergleich: Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Goodyear

Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Anzahl der Tests

—

14

3

Optimale Position

—

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

—

3.6

3.3

4.7

Neuester Test

—

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

—

188

40

126

Nass

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Nassbremsen

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - längs

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Handling - nass

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - quer

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kreisbahn nass

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Schnee

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Schnee Handling

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Schneetraktion

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Schnee Slalom

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trocken

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Trockenbremsen

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Handling - trocken

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Komfort

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Außengeräusch

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Innengeräusche

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Kosten

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rollwiderstand

Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Ultragrip Performance+ Suv

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen