Vergleich: Imperial EcoDriver 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Imperial

EcoDriver 5

R14 – R16

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

EcoDriver 5

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

3

10

3

Optimale Position

#17

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

29.0

6.0

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

46

104

40

34

Nass

Imperial EcoDriver 5

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kreisbahn nass

Imperial EcoDriver 5

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Imperial EcoDriver 5

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Imperial EcoDriver 5

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Imperial EcoDriver 5

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Imperial EcoDriver 5

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken

Imperial EcoDriver 5

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Handling - trocken

Imperial EcoDriver 5

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Trockenbremsen

Imperial EcoDriver 5

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Komfort

Imperial EcoDriver 5

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Imperial EcoDriver 5

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Imperial EcoDriver 5

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Imperial EcoDriver 5

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Imperial EcoDriver 5

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Imperial EcoDriver 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

EcoDriver 5

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen