56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
10
4
3
1
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
12.0
3.3
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
104
111
40
64
34

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich