56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis+ gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Michelin
Agilis+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
2
3
4
Optimale Position
#10
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
1.0
3.3
12.0
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
23
40
111

Nass

Nass
Michelin Agilis+
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Agilis+
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Agilis+
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Michelin Agilis+
33%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Agilis+
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Agilis+
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Agilis+
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Agilis+
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich