57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Michelin
Agilis+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
2
4
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
3.3
1.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
40
23
111

Nass

Nass
Michelin Agilis+
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Agilis+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Agilis+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Michelin Agilis+
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Agilis+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Agilis+
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Agilis+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Agilis+
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich