Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

2

3

24

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

1.5

3.7

2.7

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

111

40

65

34

302

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Seitenführung

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen