Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

14

1

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

3.7

3.6

1.0

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

111

40

34

188

64

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen