56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
3
23
2
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
34
176
23

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich