56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
6
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
146

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich