56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
3.3
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
34
126

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich