57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
1
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
64

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich