Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Energy Saver +

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

4

6

Optimale Position

#5

#2

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

10.3

3.3

12.0

4.7

Neuester Test

2018

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

—

40

111

146

Nass

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Handling - nass

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kosten

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Kilometerstand

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Komfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Außengeräusch

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Trocken

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Handling - trocken

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Energy Saver +

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen