57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
—
40
126

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich