56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
1
3
Optimale Position
#7
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
23
34
64
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich