56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
6
Optimale Position
#7
#3
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
5.5
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
Verfügbare Größen
23
153
146

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WR C3
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich