Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

P ZERO

Advantage

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

17

14

3

Optimale Position

#1

#8

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

13.4

4.7

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2020

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

330

153

126

40

34

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Seitenführung

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Nassleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin Primacy 5

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trockenleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

Advantage

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen