Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

P ZERO

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Anzahl der Tests

17

15

3

4

3

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#3

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

9.0

3.3

12.0

3.3

Neuester Test

2020

2025

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

329

225

40

111

60

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Pirelli P ZERO

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

P ZERO

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen