56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Sava Eskimo HP2 gegen Viking WinTech gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Testprofil

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Viking
WinTech
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Anzahl der Tests
15
6
23
Optimale Position
#6
#11
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
15.5
20.8
6.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
28
59
107

Schnee

Schnee
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Viking WinTech
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Schneetraktion
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Viking WinTech
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Viking WinTech
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Viking WinTech
47%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Schneeleistung
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Viking WinTech
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Schnee Slalom
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Viking WinTech
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%

Trocken

Trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Viking WinTech
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Trockenbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Viking WinTech
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Viking WinTech
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Trockenleistung
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Viking WinTech
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Handling - trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Viking WinTech
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Nass

Nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Viking WinTech
55%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Nassbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Viking WinTech
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplaning - quer
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Viking WinTech
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Viking WinTech
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Handling - nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Viking WinTech
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Viking WinTech
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Viking WinTech
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kilometerstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Viking WinTech
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Preis-Wert
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Viking WinTech
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Rollwiderstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Viking WinTech
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Außengeräusch
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Viking WinTech
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Komfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Innengeräusche
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Viking WinTech
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Eis

Eis
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Viking WinTech
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Eis bremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Viking WinTech
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Eis seitenführung
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Viking WinTech
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich