57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
24
1
3
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
2.7
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
40
151
27
34

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Schnee Slalom
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Schneetraktion
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich