Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Fourtech

Blizzak LM-005

CrossClimate 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Anzahl der Tests

5

49

24

23

Optimale Position

#11

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

17.0

3.2

2.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2021

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

32

213

150

176

Nass

Viking Fourtech

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Nassbremsen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking Fourtech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Handling - nass

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Schnee

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Viking Fourtech

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee Slalom

Viking Fourtech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Schnee Handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schneetraktion

Viking Fourtech

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rollwiderstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometerstand

Viking Fourtech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Preis-Wert

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Trocken

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Trockenbremsen

Viking Fourtech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Handling - trocken

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Außengeräusch

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Fourtech

Blizzak LM-005

CrossClimate 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Trocken

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen