56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
3
3
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
64
40
34
151

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich