Vergleich: Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro+

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Wintrac Pro+

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

9

13

3

Optimale Position

#4

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

7.2

4.3

3.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

50

123

34

40

Nass

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

81%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nassbremsen

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

86%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

90%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nassleistung

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Seitenführung

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

70%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Schnee

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

64%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

75%

Schneetraktion

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

69%

Schnee Handling

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

64%

Trocken

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

63%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

64%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Trockenleistung

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

47%

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

52%

Michelin Primacy 4+

90%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kosten

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

48%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

57%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

46%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Komfort

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Komfort

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

90%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Außengeräusch

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

91%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Wintrac Pro+

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen