56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
21
4
18
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.8
11.9
12.0
6.1
Neuester Test
2019
2024
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
35
164
111
47

Nass

Nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Handling - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Trockenbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Rollwiderstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Preis-Wert
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Innengeräusche
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich