Vergleich: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro gegen Firestone Winterhawk 4 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

1 gemeinsame Tests mit detaillierten Daten

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Winterhawk 4

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance 3

Anzahl der Tests

13

19

14

24

Optimale Position

#7

#5

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

10.7

3.6

2.7

Neuester Test

2025

Verfügbare Größen

78

101

188

302

Leistungsvergleich

Nassleistung

66%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

90%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Nassbremsen

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

59%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Handling - nass

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Kreisbahn nass

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Aquaplaning längs

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Aquaplaning quer

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

56%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Trockenleistung

81%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

69%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Trockenbremsen

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Handling - trocken

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Schneeleistung

53%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

81%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Bremsen auf Schnee

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

51%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Schneetraktion

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

51%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Schnee Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

46%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Schneekreis (Kurvenfahrt)

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

63%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

71%

Komfort und Lärm

74%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Außengeräusch

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Fahrkomfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Wirtschaft

56%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

Firestone

Winterhawk 4

89%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Rollwiderstand

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

42%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

65%

Kilometerstand

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Firestone Winterhawk 4

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Im Vergleich verwendete Tests

Organisation	Jahreszeit	Jahr	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	Ansehen

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Allgemeinen Vergleich anzeigen

Vergleich: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro gegen Firestone Winterhawk 4 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Winterhawk 4

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Leistungsvergleich

Im Vergleich verwendete Tests

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen