57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
4
3
3
2
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
12.0
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
111
34
40
23

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich