56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
3
4
3
1
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
40
111
34
64
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich