56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
18
10
3
13
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.1
6.0
4.7
4.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
47
104
126
123

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich