56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
1
26
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
1.0
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
64
66
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich