57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
13
3
1
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.3
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
123
40
64
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich