57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
3
4
18
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
3.3
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
40
111
47
34
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich