56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Petlas Imperium PT515Budget
PetlasPetlas

Imperium PT515

4.2
R15 – R16
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
4
18
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
12.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
111
47
34
40
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich