57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
13
3
4
1
24
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
61
36
40
66
150

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen