56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
3
49
3
26
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.2
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
213
34
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich