57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
3
23
3
26
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#4
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.3
4.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
176
97
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich